Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JAC Antimicrob Resist ; 6(2): dlae041, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38523731

RESUMO

Objectives: The study aimed to investigate behaviour, knowledge and practices towards antibiotic (AB) use among patients who purchased ABs with a prescription across Russia. Methods: Semi-structured interviews conducted in all eight Federal Districts, Moscow and Saint Petersburg in 2022 by 21 researchers trained specifically for this study. Data were analysed using a directed content analysis approach. Results: In total, 151 respondents were interviewed. Respiratory symptoms were the most common reason for AB prescription. The majority of patients discussed their complaints with family members or friends before consulting the physician and occasionally looked for information on antimicrobial treatment on the internet. The decision to use an AB was usually made by the physician, although patients often anticipated its prescription. Respondents typically chose to go to the nearest drug store to pick up the medicines, not seeking any recommendation from the local pharmacists. The level of knowledge about the effects of ABs was generally low. In most cases, patients were not aware of antimicrobial resistance and rarely recalled any information campaigns targeting prudent AB use. Respondents admitted COVID-19 had an impact on their behaviour: they have become more caring towards their health, but less likely to seek medical care because of the risk of infection. Conclusions: Our findings, in particular low awareness of the population about the effects of ABs and antimicrobial resistance, peculiarities of attitudes and behaviour (significant influence of the environment, tendency to self-diagnose, fairly high level of trust in doctors etc.) can be useful for the development of effective initiatives aiming for prudent AB use.

2.
Genes (Basel) ; 14(3)2023 03 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36980916

RESUMO

Thrombosis is an extremely dangerous complication in elderly patients with COVID-19. Since the first months of the pandemic, anticoagulants have been mandatory in treatment protocols for patients with COVID-19, unless there are serious contraindications. We set out to discover if genetic thrombophilia factors continue to play a triggering role in the occurrence of thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 with prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulants. We considered the following genetic markers as risk factors for thrombophilia: G1691A in the FV gene, C677T and A1298C in the MTHFR gene, G20210A and C494T in the FII gene, and (-675) 4G/5G in the PAI-I gene. In a cohort of 176 patients, we did not obtain a reliable result indicating a higher risk of thrombotic complications when taking therapeutic doses of anticoagulants in carriers of genetic markers for thrombophilia except the C494T mutation in the FII gene. However, there was still a pronounced tendency to a higher incidence of thrombosis in patients with markers of hereditary thrombophilia, such as FV G1691A and FII G20210A mutations. The presence of the C494T (Thr165Met) allele in the FII gene in this group of patients showed a statistically significant effect of the mutation on the risk of thrombotic complications despite anticoagulant therapy.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Trombofilia , Trombose , Humanos , Idoso , Marcadores Genéticos , Protrombina/genética , Fator V/genética , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/genética , Trombose/genética , Trombofilia/genética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...